<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Monday, January 30, 2006

As we all know, when we hit retirement age we come face to face with the fact that it may be time to relocate.

The big question is, 'Where to... ?' Here are some tips to help you decide.


You can live in Phoenix, Arizona where.....

1. You are willing to park 3 blocks away because you found shade.
2. You can open and drive your car without touching the car door or the steering wheel.
3. You've experienced condensation on your butt from the hot water in the toilet bowl.
4. You would give anything to be able to splash cold water on your face. 5. You can attend any function wearing shorts and a tank top.
6. "Dress Code" is meaningless at high schools and universities. Picture lingerie ads.
7. You can drive for 4 hours in one direction and never leave town.
8. You have over 100 recipes for Mexican food.
9. The 4 seasons are: tolerable, hot, really hot, and ARE YOU KIDDING ME??!!
10. You know that "dry heat" is comparable to what hits you in the face when you open your oven door.


Or, you can live in California where...

1. You make over $250,000.00 a year, and you still can't afford to buy a house.
2. The high school quarterback calls a time-out to answer his cellphone. 3. The fastest part of your commute is going down your driveway.
4. You know how to eat an artichoke.
5. You drive your rented Mercedes to your neighborhood block party.
6. When someone asks you how far something is, you tell them how long it will take to get there rather than how many miles away it is.


Or, you can live in New York City where...

1. You say "the city" and expect everyone to know you mean Manhattan.
2. You have never been to the Statue of Liberty or the Empire State Building.
3. You can get into a four-hour argument about how to get from Columbus Circle to Battery Park, but can't find Wisconsin on a map.
4. You think Central Park is "nature."
5. You believe that being able to swear at people in their own language makes you multi-lingual.
6. You've worn out a car horn.
7. You think eye contact is an act of aggression.


Or, you can live in Maine where...
1. You only have four spices: salt, pepper, ketchup, and Tabasco.
2. Halloween costumes fit over parkas.
3. You have more than one recipe for moose.
4. Sexy lingerie is anything flannel with less than eight buttons.
5. The four seasons are: winter, still winter, almost winter, and construction.


Or, you can live in the Deep South where...
1. You can rent a movie and buy bait in the same store.
2."y'all" is singular and "all y'all" is plural.
3. After five years you still hear, "You ain't from 'round here, are Ya?"
4. "He needed killin' " is a valid defense.
5. Everyone has 2 first names: BillyRay, JimmyBob, MarySue, BettyJean, RuthieBeth, etc.


Or, you can live in Colorado where...

1. You carry your $3,000 mountain bike atop your $500 car.
2. You tell your husband to pick up Granola on his way home and he stops at the day care center.
3. A pass does NOT involve a football or dating.
4. The top of your head is bald, but you still have a pony tail.


Or, you can live in the Midwest where...
1. You've never met any celebrities, but the mayor knows your name.
2. Your idea of a traffic jam is ten cars waiting to pass a tractor.
3. You have had to switch from "heat" to "A/C" on the same day.
4. You end sentences with a preposition: "Where's my coat at"?
5. When asked how your trip was to any exotic place, you say, "It was different"!


Or, of course, you can live in Florida where...
1. You eat dinner at 3:15 in the afternoon.
2. All purchases include a coupon of some kind - even houses and cars.
3. Everyone can recommend an excellent dermatologist.
4. Road construction never ends anywhere in the state.
5. Cars in front of you are often driven by headless people.



This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 5:28 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Saturday, January 28, 2006


David Icke, Arizona Wilder and the Biggest Secret


By Ivan FraserThe following is a short summary of a minor investigation into aspects of David Icke’s latest book and his star witnesses Arizona Wilder and Credo Mutwa. Wilder claims to have been a mind controlled slave who performed Satanic rituals for the Illuminati at which she witnessed many famous people including the Queen Mother, shapeshift physically from a human to a lizard and consume sacrificial victims. She claims that since her programming broke down she has been able to reveal this information to the wider public. My own role in the Biggest Secret saga was that I was asked by David to help him check spelling and offer any further information to his initial draft of the book. It was following my input that David was introduced to Arizona and heard her revelations, which subsequently became a focal point within the book and used as ‘evidence’ to support various themes outlined therein. Having discussed my concerns with David’s wife and having sent David e-mails outlining my concerns over errors in his book and a feeling I have that he has been set up with misinformation and been the target of psychic manipulation, over a period from before publication to very recently (September 1999), and as yet having absolutely no feedback from David about any of the major concerns, I decided to publish my findings at the David Icke website forum. Consequently, I was banned from attending that forum by David Icke. I wish it to be known that I bear David Icke no malice over this affair and the reason for publishing this information is to seek clarification and also offer information of which most may not be aware. My fears may be unfounded, but I feel that after reading this, you may see they are justified. And if my fears have solid foundation, these issues need urgent clarification, both for the sake of David Icke and his readers. My suspicions about Arizona Wilder (AW) first manifested the first time I heard of her. Something in me said, ‘something isn’t right here’. A familiar feeling which usually turns out to be trustworthy, as anyone who has read Lifting The Veil knows. She was not mentioned at all in the draft copy of The Biggest Secret (TBS) which I had read. David had not met her yet. When the book was released people started ringing me with questions like, ‘is it true about the reptiles’, and ‘is this stuff about the royal family true’. At which time I replied that I thought it was, based on the fact that the version I had read stated only the theory of the reptilians and that certain of the Royals were involved in Satanic rituals. Soon I heard about Arizona Wilder. I reviewed the book again, this time the printed version, and asked Linda Icke (the British manager of Bridge of Love) to send a copy of the video from which AW’s testimony was taken. I was by this time very dubious about AW’s statements. Her statements had already overshadowed those of Christine Fitzgerald, Princess Diana’s healer and confidante, which were prominent in the version I read and which were not so sensational. However, Fitzgerald’s account may have been a ‘taster’ for what was to come, to ease the way for the far more incredible information which Wilder had to impart. David stated that he saw his encounter with AW as an amazing synchronicity which endorsed his work in his latest book. How could she have known all of this stuff which tallied so exactly with TBS? Well, I believe I am not as naïve as David, and I know exactly how she could have known. He was passing copies of the book via post to me and others for editing. It was on computer. Both are simple to access by Intelligence people. We had also spoken over the phone about the reptilian issue. In fact I am shocked that David does not see this as a possibility himself. This brings I another character who is pivotal to the entire Biggest Secret thesis. It was a contact of David’s named Brian Desborough who introduced Arizona to David. Brian is mentioned as a source for a great deal of information in the book, having supplied most of the material upon which David based his idea that Martians came to Earth and founded the Aryan race which the reptilians used as a vehicle to overtake the planet. Brian is also the source of much of the information David had compiled on the Babylonian world, its myths and how they fed into the sinister secret societies. It was Brian Desborough, a scientist and researcher who had worked for several aerospace companies, who was also looking at the draft copy of the Biggest Secret at the same time as myself; i.e. before David met Arizona Wilder. Therefore the fact that Brian Desborough may be responsible for fundamentally leading the direction of David’s research, if not planting much of the basis of the book in David’s mind, is obvious. But then to be the same person responsible for giving him a so-called eye-witness to testify to the verity of that information is highly suspicious. Brian also writes articles on mind control and seems very knowledgeable on the subject. Is it possible that he could be directly involved in some way that we are not being told about? Cathy O’Brien testifies to having been taken to military aerospace locations and NASA bases for trauma-based programming. David met AW and interviewed her for about 2 hours. Some of the questions were quite leading, but her testimony revealed an awful lot if you know what you are looking for. She did indeed endorse a great deal of David’s own theses; that is other people’s theses (again including many of Desborough’s) which David has agreed with. So closely, in fact, you would almost think she had already read the book - or had been given the information beforehand! Or, considering that she claims to be an ex-mind controlled slave, could it be she was pre-programmed? Testimony from Mark Philips and Cathy O’Brien as to how arduous it is to deprogram a CIA slave makes me very suspicious that AW could be considered reliable. She claims that since her programmer died, the programming broke down. I don’t believe this can be accepted as such, and external experts would have to be brought in to convince me that if she was controlled to the highest level, that she could be so deprogrammed now as to be considered reliable. And don’t forget how much influence her testimony had to the final version of David’s book. It was her and only her who provided all the information about physically shapeshifting royalty, Pindar, the Belgian blood rituals which were allegedly attended by everyone from Laurence Gardner (!!??) to the Queen Mother! Before I watched the video I dowsed the box with a pendulum and asked questions. I don’t usually use dowsing, but considered it may be useful to evaluate this case from as many angles as I could because if I was correct in my gut feeling then I had stumbled upon some very significant realisations. The basic questions were: Was she going to be telling me the truth? Yes. Wow! I hadn’t expected that. Was she also going to be telling lies? Yes. Ah! As I thought she was a Multiple Personality, I assumed that she had been set up. So I asked, ‘Is she going to deliberately misinform David?’ Yes. This made me curious because I thought she would be doing it from programming. I always like to ask questions I know the answers of now and then to check whether I am interpreting the pendulum correctly. So I asked a question I was sure of the answer to: ‘Is she a programmed multiple?’ No. That was absolutely the last thing I expected. I couldn’t see how she could be lying to deliberately misinform and not been a set-up multiple stooge. ‘Then she isn’t a multiple?’ Yes. ‘So has she ever been programmed as a multiple?’ No. ‘She is going to lie deliberately in full awareness?’ Yes. Now that was only an initial test and I don’t put too much store in my abilities as a dowser. But I tell you my line of enquiry so that you know. So I watched the video in order to get the full picture. As I said, her testimony tallied so well with David’s that I can see how he was so impressed. He has always stated that he works on cross-referencing testimonies and ‘synchronicities’ as proof. Well, this time I think the Intelligence people took advantage of that one! More revealing, however, about AW’s ‘evidence’ was that she demonised the ancient archetypes and occult images throughout. Osiris, Isis, Druids, even Harvest Festival. My own research tells me that there is a very positive side to these things. In fact these things are exactly what the Bible was written to obscure. AW’s testimony was overtly Judeo-Christian in its level of gross and blanket demonisation of the occult. Something which I had warned David about doing when I read his draft. Something which he promised to amend for the final version. But of course, that was before he met AW. And as a consequence of her testimony, it seems, David decided not to balance out his demonisation, but instead increased it. If I was going to set David up to make that mistake, that’s exactly how I would have done it! Then came some obvious bloopers. Having claimed to have been a multiple, she also states she forgets certain names of people. Multiples have photographic memory and perfect recall (see Cathy O’Brien’s testimonies). This memory lapse does not happen in recovered multiples. Her facts were either regularly wrong, or so full of spin that she was hardly credible. Other information is impossible for anyone to verify, conveniently. I checked with 2 occultists about her description of the demon raising ritual and both stated she had it wrong. Strange for a top level Satanist! Then she targeted Sitchin and Gardner and said they take part in blood rituals with the Royals where shapeshifting happens. Considering Gardner’s books are revealing profound insights into the ancient knowledge, I am not surprised they wanted him demonised. I personally do not believe this testimony. I do however, think that Sitchin has been less than honest in his research, but again, the statement that he takes part in murderous rituals is more than I will accept without some pretty firm proof. But proof is offered nowhere in relation to AW’s testimony. She states the royal lizards change back to lizards when asleep. Considering how many of them were educated in schools where they also lived amongst hundreds of others in dorms, and how many of them were in the armed forces, you would think someone would have noticed this little thing! She states that the royal lizards can’t stay in human form at the scent of blood and transform and go crazy, ripping into their victims. And in all those years nobody has ever noticed this when they have cut themselves, been around blood, menstruating women etc. Considering they are so public, there is no way they have never been in the vicinity of blood. No signs there though either. I thought, ‘this is just too ridiculous for words. David how the hell are you allowing this nonsense to influence you?’ She regularly inverts important ideas. The ancient Egyptians were anointed with the fat of the dragon - the sacred crocodile. AW states that the royal lizards anoint themselves with the fat of humans. Head lizard is Pindar. How similar is Pindar to ben Pandir, the Talmudic name for Jesus? Reversal at a deep archetypal and psychological level? I think so. And there are more examples too numerous to go into. I think you get the point. Then strange things started happening as I watched the video. I kept getting psychic impressions of other people overlaid on her face. The first, Ingrid Pitt, whom I associate with Countess Bathory as she played her in the film Countess Dracula. Bathory is reputed to have been kept young by bathing in the blood of virgins. Then, of all people, Jimmy Carter. I immediately recall David’s testimony in ‘And The Truth Shall Set You Free’, where he describes being possessed by Carter’s energy from which he needed healing later. Was that a hint that David had been possessed again? Then Sigourney Weaver. I had been informed by a seer once that she is a predator vehicle, like many others in the Hollywood scene. That is, she is possessed by the reptoid/Luciferic consciousness. I cannot claim to know that to be true, but it did seem to fit very neatly with the scenario I was experiencing. Then a face I couldn’t put a name to at first. I didn’t know where I had seen her. Then later I realised, it was the face of the head alien reptile in the television series V, called Diana. A reptile in human skin who was conning the world to believe that the reptile aliens were on their side. Was my higher self telling me something here or what?! Was AW a predator vehicle too, and not a multiple at all, like the dowsing suggested? Again, I wanted more proof. As I had been a nurse for 9 years, I am quite aware of body language and communication. What I was seeing with AW was someone who was far too inexpressive with her hands and expressions. She seemed to be deliberately avoiding any kind of body language in case she gave the game away. I also know a genuine multiple who HAS performed satanic ritual called Patti and whom I had introduced David to years ago, setting him off on the track of this whole Satanic thing. He refers to her in his books ‘I Am Me, I Am Free’ and ‘The Biggest Secret’ as ‘a contact from Darlington’. I know this woman well and am accustomed to her body language and how she flips between personalities and how she displays quite notable body language if you know what you are looking for. I also have interviewed her priest (an exorcist) and her ex-Harley Street therapist and discussed this subject at length. And I have spoken to Cathy O’Brien and Mark Philips about this, albeit briefly. To me, AW was not displaying what I expected in terms of body language. Everything I saw told me she was hiding something. So I contacted the aforementioned expert; a professional therapist, specialising in multiples and victims of abuse, including those from government level paedophile circles. I had introduced her to David a couple of years ago and he mentions her in TBS. She looked at the video and agreed with my analysis. AW was not a multiple, nor seems to have ever been one. Her body language did not reveal this and suggested that she was deliberately lying and trying to keep from revealing this. She also has grave concerns about David, his health, his reptilian thesis, and that he may be under a great deal of pressure and psychic attack from those trying to pervert his work. She agreed that what I suspected was the more likely case - AW is a deliberate set up and her testimony is absolutely not to be trusted. I also emailed Cathy O’Brien and Mark Philips for a comment from them, but got no response. I later heard from another contact that they were avoiding speaking out about David’s latest book. I later got calls from some very concerned people telling me that AW tripped their inner warning bells so much that they couldn’t accept her testimony and for that reason were very dubious about the book. Others contacted me to say they were seeing negative energies around David. If AW is a Satanist and has the kind of power she claims - and she would have to be one of the world’s most powerful magicians to work for the global elite in their highest rituals - then David is in extreme danger of being infected by her demonic magic if he spends any time with her. If I am wrong, and she is a multiple, but has not recovered, she may be working on David without either his or her knowledge. She also claims to be part of a church involved in satanic ritual. But she also claims to be out of it. But she also knows enough to warn people about forthcoming rituals. Is she in, or is she out? Who can tell? How is she still around considering what she is revealing? How did they let her programming slip? How come she was performing rituals with the likes of Tony Blair (that means it must be very recent) at a time when her programming was coming apart? I have seen the chaos Patti goes through as she has been regaining coherence over the years. And this is the woman we are expected was performing the highest level rituals in the world? Give me a break! So I phoned Linda Icke. I told her of my concerns. As well as my concerns over David’s historical inaccuracies, lack of occult understanding, and flaws in his reptilian thesis. I said I was concerned that he had stated on radio that he was unusually drained of energy and had been ill for a while. She agreed I may be right and said that David has to face his own mistakes and defend himself in his own way. Amazingly, when I told her what had transpired over the video and what I had looked into, she told me that David doesn’t actually trust AW!!!! ‘He’s the first to say "you can’t trust her,"’ she said!!! So why is he selling a 2-hour interview with the woman?! Why is he accepting her testimony at all? Why has he refashioned so much of his work around her claims? If it hadn’t been for her, the text would be far less sensational, less risible and have a far more balanced analysis of the occult. This single woman has so overshadowed the real information in TBS that I no longer am able to trust a lot of it simply on David’s say so. I no longer trust David’s previously excellent antenna for getting to the truth. Has Wilder also done something to David to lower his guard and turn him around? He certainly does not seem to me to be the same man he was. And that is what I am hearing time and time again from other people too. I then contacted two people whom I know and trust who I consider to be as knowledgeable about the psychic aspects as I believe anybody could be. They both said the video was total nonsense. One (a well known author and Remote Viewing and mind control expert) agreed with my analysis 100%, that she was part of an Intelligence set up. I showed Patti. She called the video, ‘A piece of shit.’ But granted, she may not be considered the ideal judge. I had reports of people hosting David’s lectures who were so disturbed by the incredibility of the video that they stated that if it were not for the fact that it was David supporting it, they would never have sold it. Then consider the Illuminati ritual post on the website, which I refer to in my chapter The Predators (Truth Campaign magazine 14). AW and David warn people about key dates and asked them to send love and light to the reptiles. As I pointed out in the article, this only feeds the problem as they are feeding an illusion - a psychotronic virus. Moreover, on one of the dates mentioned, I attended, but did not partake in, a mass channelling meditation, which was actually a guided meditation which opened the participating crowd up to predator possession. I feel compelled to see this as further confirmation that the entire AW scenario is part of a wider conspiracy to jointly misinform, psychically attack and control the audience! Who is influencing David Icke and why? The results of following the book, and his advice certainly seem sinister. Then we had the solar eclipse, another blood ritual date according to AW. David went to the Great Pyramid in Egypt on that date for the eclipse and made all kinds of superficial comments about what seemed to be going on there. He said people were prevented from going in, that the attendees may be using underground tunnels to get in to do their blood rituals etc. No proof. And everything was adequately explained by Amargi Hiller, an independent journalist who works closely investigating the Giza site, in a message which was posted on David’s Forum. But what did David do? On this very powerful day, he had people all over the world sending thought energy based upon the most horrific images of blood-spattered tombs and child sacrifice, DIRECTED AT PERHAPS THE MOST POWERFUL ENERGY POINT IN THE WORLD! Did they really need to do a blood ritual with that kind of energy focussed on it? Is this another way that David has been set up to actually do the very job he is trying to expose? I refer you to my chapter on the predators to see how that may fit into the Illuminati agenda. Soon after this, David re-emerged from a trip to Africa announcing a new video called The Reptilian Agenda, which is an interview with a Zulu shaman called Credo Mutwa, who is confirming the existence of shapeshifting reptilians. Credo recounts various ancient Zulu myths about the reptilian race which manipulates mankind, which are taken literally by himself and Icke and seen as remarkable confirmation of the reptile/human-race theory; although Credo’s version is that the race actually originated on Earth, left it and returned. Furthermore, the central reptile/Aryan race thesis is fundamentally challenged by Mutwa’s assertion that the black leaders of his country, and their bloodlines are from the reptilian race also. Mutwa also speaks about personal encounters with ‘grey’ aliens, which he states are servants of the reptilians. He recounts eating the ‘grey, rather dry’ skin of the greys - which caused an hallucinogenic experience very reminiscent of LSD or similar drug experiences as well as a rash and intense itching. This, again, parallels MKULTRA mind control experiments/implantation experiences described by military abductees. Mutwa elsewhere, rather contradictorily, states elsewhere that ‘greys’ are actually reptilians with an artificial ‘skin’. This contradiction is not challenged by Icke. Interestingly, this man claims to have been abducted 40 years ago by greys, had something stuffed up his nose into his head etc. In an interview with The Spectrum Newspaper, Mutwa recalls walking down the street one day when a man approached him and quizzed him about knowing him from somewhere, and he recalled a memory about being in the underground facility where he was taken following his abduction, where he was experimented on by ‘greys’ in ways remarkably consistent with the classic MILAB (Military Abduction) scenario. Mutwa states in the interview that this exact same thing has happened to many of his people. The link with Montauk is also interesting. One engineer working on the ‘Montauk Project’, Preston Nichols, talks of having worked in the project - which included abductions for mind control. He says he remembers working in underground bases where greys and a reptilian creature also were. He recovered the memory of this after being confronted in the street by a man quizzing him on having seen him somewhere before. This parallel, almost identical, scenario seems to be too coincidental. I think the greys and reptoid were implants in the vein described by Helmut Lammer in his book MILABS. Both tales have all the hallmarks of mind control. Mutwa is therefore, for my money, not a credible witness for David Icke. David sees Mutwa as ‘proof’ of his thesis in his latest book, and since slightly altered aspects of his views to accommodate Mutwa’s new information. Again, there is severe doubt cast on yet another of David’s main sources of information on the reptilian issue. However, the alien abduction issue aside, Mutwa seems a very genuine and sincere man, bravely determined to tell the world about what he feels is the plight of his people and their dreadful manipulation by the Illuminati forces. His interview with Spectrum can be read on Icke’s website. Both Mutwa and Wilder may be consciously absolutely genuine in recounting their experiences according to their memories. But knowing what we do about the long history of Illuminati/intelligence/military abduction and false memory implantation, mind-control etc., for propaganda, subversion and discrediting of witnesses purposes, I believe we need to be extremely careful before buying into what amount to little more than two circumstantial stories that offer next to no proof, given what we know of their backgrounds. One is a self-admitted Illuminati agent, and the other a self-admitted ‘alien abductee’. I ask you to consider this. Ask you self who benefits from you buying into Wilder’s and Credo Mutwa’s stories? Then consider what David says himself: ‘JUST A COINCIDENCE, NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT!’ It’s entirely up to you. I am just giving this from my viewpoint. I may be wrong. If I am, I apologise unreservedly for casting aspersions on those who may be genuine. But I think there are enough doubts to warrant further explanation from someone at Bridge of Love. Because if Wilder’s and Desborough’s claims in The Biggest Secret are essentially true, then it needs to be acted upon as a matter of urgency. But the evidence needs to be as accurate and enforceable as possible. At present I don’t believe that a large amount of the so-called ‘evidence’ is any more than highly speculative, inaccurate and suspicious. Does anybody have any more information to add to this? Do David or Brian Desborough have any information to give us to show us we can trust Wilder? Is there anything David could tell us about Brian Desborough’s background to allay any doubts we may have about his integrity, considering his massive influence in the content and direction of The Biggest Secret? Does anybody have any direct proof of any of the wild claims being made? For example, if Mutwa has captured greys and eaten them, then are there any remains, photographs or corroborating witnesses to present? For, until some actual evidence of this story appears, all we have is a very good draft of a science fiction novel that still needs careful work to iron out the inconsistencies in the plot. I wonder how many of the loopholes in the story will be closed as the thesis is conveniently ironed out over time, so that it serves as the ‘master-theory’ of conspiracy theories? How many remarkable witnesses will appear who have more pieces of the jigsaw as David strives to prove that his theory is really the Biggest Secret? One historical inconsistency of David’s book has been closed by Mutwa, as he tells of how the reptilians ordered that no direct image of their real appearance was to be depicted by anyone, otherwise that would mean instant death. This conveniently closes a loophole which David missed in his book, that despite claims by him to the contrary, there are actually very few depictions of reptilian gods in ancient sources. Of course we now know why. Instead, we are told, people depicted them in code, using various ciphers such as fish scaled creatures instead of reptilian scales etc. But oddly, in an interview with Jeff Rense on his Sightings radio show on 14 October 1999, Mutwa claimed that the figure of Darth Maul - the alien ‘baddie’ in the latest Star Wars movie – is an absolute dead ringer for one of these ‘gods’, right down to the colour. As yet, I have not heard of the mass demise of George Lucas or the Star Wars makeup department and design team. Like the above example of the grey flesh vs. artificial skin contradiction, such inconsistencies go unchallenged by Icke and, it seems, by most of his audience. David has an excellent track record of bringing hard to get information into the wider public arena. He has worked extremely hard and endured a great deal of ridicule for courageously speaking out and standing up for what he believes in. It would be ‘The Biggest Shame’, if his efforts and work were to be overtaken and used by the very forces he seeks to expose. From The Truth Campaign issue 15 www.vegan.swinternet.co.uk/mainpages/magazines_frame.html Ivan Fraser
Printer friendly version
Email this article to a friend
Last updated 12/08/2004
Homepage
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 5:47 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Thursday, January 19, 2006

DO YOU SMELL THAT?

At the end of this story, it gives you two options. I think you will figure out what option I chose.

A cold March wind danced around the dead of night in Dallas as the doctor walked into the small hospital room of Diana Blessing.

She was still groggy from surgery.
Her husband, David, held her hand as they braced themselves for the latest news.

That afternoon of March 10, 1991, complications had forced Diana, only 24-weeks pregnant, to undergo an emergency Cesarean to deliver couple's new daughter, Dana Lu Blessing.

At 12 inches long and weighing only one pound nine ounces, they already knew she was perilously premature. Still, the doctor's soft words dropped like bombs. "I don't think she's going to make it,"he said, as kindly as he could.

"There's only a 10-percent chance she will live through the night, and even then, if by some slim chance she does make it, her future could be a very cruel one."

Numb with disbelief, David and Diana listened as the doctor described the devastating problems Dana would likely face if she survived.

She would never walk, she would never talk, she would probably be blind, and she would certainly be prone to other catastrophic conditions from cerebral palsy to complete mental retardation, and on and on.

"No! No!" was all Diana could say.

She and David, with their 5-year-old son Dustin, had long dreamed of the day they would have a daughter to become a family of four.

Now, within a matter of hours, that dream was slipping away. But as those first days passed, a new agony set in for David and Diana. Because Dana's underdeveloped nervous system was essentially 'raw', the lightest kiss or caress only intensified her discomfort, so they couldn't even cradle their tiny baby girl against their chests to offer the strength of their love.

All they could do, as Dana struggled alone beneath the ultraviolet light in the tangle of tubes and wires, was to pray that GOD would stay close to their precious little girl.

There was never a moment when Dana suddenly grew stronger. But as the weeks went by, she did slowly gain an ounce of weight here and an ounce of strength there.

At last, when Dana turned two months old, her parents were able to hold her in their arms for the very first time. And two months later, though doctors continued to gently but grimly warn that her chances of surviving, much less living any kind of normal life, were next to zero, Dana went home from the hospital, just as her mother had predicted.

Five years later, when Dana was a petite but feisty young girl with glittering gray eyes and an unquenchable zest for life. She showed no signs whatsoever of any mental or physical impairment.

Simply, she was everything a little girl can be and more. But that happy ending is far from the end of her story. One blistering afternoon in the summer of 1996 near her home in Irving, Texas, Dana was sitting in her mother's lap in the bleachers of a local ball park where her brother Dustin's baseball team was practicing.

As always, Dana was chattering nonstop with her mother and several other adults sitting nearby when she suddenly fell silent Hugging her arms across her chest, little Dana asked, "Do you smell that?"

Smelling the air and detecting the approach of a thunderstorm, Diana replied, "Yes, it smells like rain." Dana closed her eyes and again asked, "Do you smell that?" Once again, her mother replied, "Yes, I think we're about to get wet. It smells like rain."

Still caught in the moment, Dana shook her head, patted her thin shoulders with her small hands and loudly announced,

"No, it smells like HIM. It smells like GOD when you lay your head on HIS chest."

Tears blurred Diana's eyes as Dana happily hopped down to play with the other children. Before the rains came, her daughter's words confirmed what Diana and all the members of the extended Blessing family had known, at least in their hearts, all along.

During those long days and nights of her first two months of her life, when her nerves were too sensitive for them to touch her, GOD was holding Dana on HIS chest and it is HIS loving scent that she remembers so well.

You now have 1 of 2 choices. You can either pass this on and let other people catch the chills like you did, or you can delete this and act like it didn't touch your heart like it did mine.

IT'S YOUR CALL!

"I can do all things in HIM who strengthens me."

This morning when the LORD opened a window to Heaven, HE saw me, and HE asked:

"My child, what is your greatest wish for today?"

I responded: "LORD please, take care of the person who is reading this message, their family and their special friends.
They deserve it and I love them very much".

The love of GOD is like the ocean, you can see its beginning, but not its end.
This message works on the day you receive it. Let us see if it is true.

ANGELS EXIST but some times, since they don't all have wings, we call them FRIENDS.

Pass this on to your true friends. Something good will happen to you at 11:00 in the morning; something that you have been waiting to hear.

This is not a joke; someone will call you by phone or will speak to you about something that you were waiting to hear.

Do not break this prayer; send it out to all you know.
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 5:05 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Monday, January 16, 2006

BIGGER THAN YOU AND I.

Somebody Bigger Than You And I
Who made the mountain, who made the tree
Who made the river flow out to the sea
Who hung the moon up in the starry sky
Somebody bigger than you and I.

Who made the flowers to bloom in the spring
Who writes the song for the robin to sing
Who sends the rain to the earth when it's dry
Somebody bigger than you and I.

He lights the way when the road is so long
He keeps you company His love is so strong
With His love there to guide you
He walks there beside you
Just like He walks with me.

When I get weary and filled with despair
Who gives me the strength to go on
You know, It's because He does care
And Who gives me the faith which humbles me to cry
There's Somebody bigger, much Bigger than you and I.


*******************************************************************
Bigger than you and I
Words & music by Johnny Lange, Hy Heath & Sonny Burke.
Jerry Morris Bromo Records 2001 BMI,
All Rights Reserved.
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 3:00 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Sunday, January 15, 2006

100 questions :D

(5:43 p.m.)

This quiz has 100 questions. Here's what you're supposed to do....
and DON'T spoil the fun please!!

Copy this entire blog and paste it onto a your blog that you will send.

Change all the answers so that they apply to you.

Put how long it took u to do in the subject line.

The theory is that you will learn a lot of little known facts about those who know you.

1. Time: 5:44 p.m.

2. Name: Pamela Grant Goodwin Daniels.

3. Nickname: (if any): Pam, Pammie, P.M. Pamalamalam.

4. If you were a skittle what color would you be? Purple.

5. Shoe size: 7 1/2 W.

6. Zodiac: Cancer, now the CROSS.

7. Hair color: Brown/scattered grey.

8. Eye color: Medium Brown.

9. Height: 5' 0"

10. Favorite Color: Black and Red (together).

11. Glasses, contacts or neither: Glasses

12. Braces?: No, just good teeth.

13. Piercing/tattoos?: Two to an ear, no tatts.

14. Birth Place: Riverside, CA.

15. Area code: 951

16. Sibling(s) name(s): yes, eight living, and one deceased. BillieJean, Anna, Robbin, Gilbert, Loran, Kenneth, Patrick, William, and Craig.

******HAVE YOU EVER******

17. Cut your own hair?: Yes, all the time.

18. Did something in the past month that you regret?: No.

19. Have u ever met someone u were not supposed to? Maybe a few old boyfriends that gave me grief??

20. Like doing surveys? Yeah, I must.

21. Skipped school?: Back in the day, constantly!

22. Bungee jumped: Heavens no...

23. Kissed someone of the same sex not related to you?: Yeah, but not in passion, or love. Just a friendship kiss.

24. Kiss more than two people in one day?: Yes, one New Year's Day, at midnight, I did.

27. TP'd someone's house?: No, toilet paper's too precious!! haha.

28. Won something?: Sure, money, prizes, tickets, lots if stuff like that over the years.

29. Asked someone out?: Yes, long ago, over thirty - five or so years ago, I guess now.

30. Been rejected?: Not in this lifetime, yet.

31. Been to a funeral?: Plenty of them.

32. Used a lighter?: A LIGHTER what?? Yeah, sure.

33. Been on stage?: Yep, used to be in a chorus, and solo too.

******FAVORITE*****

35. Food: Asian, and SouthWestern styles.

36. Ice cream flavor: Tin Roof Sundae.

38. School subject(s): Didn't enjoy much school, but English class.

39. Breakfast cereal: Frosted Flakes.

40. Number(s): 222.

41. Book(s): Right now, all Laurell K. Hamilton books. I've read at least a million books over the last 55 years.

42. Movie(s): Serenity, Equilibrium, Matrix trilogy, BladeRunner, Fantastic Four. SciFi.

45. State?: CALIFORNIA, baby! ATW.

46. Place: In my own mind.

47. Sport to watch on TV: Swimming, gymnastics track.

48. Sport to play: Tag.

49. Bands/musicians: Kool and the Gang, George Benson.

50. Letter(s): G. L. and C.

51. Fast food restaurant: Alberto's.

52. Cartoon Character: Daffy Duck.

53. Holiday: Last thursday in November: Thanksgiving Day.

54. Name for a son: Gilbert (got this one already)!!

55. Name for a daughter: LaShane and Cherokee (got those, so I've already chosen, huh)?

******DO YOU PREFER******

56. Chocolate or Vanilla? WHAT?? I like both at times.

58. Long relationships or one night stands?: My marriage is going on it's 35th year this year.

59. Dogs or cats?: Dogs and Cats as babies. Dogs older.

60. Scary movies or comedies? The scarier the better!!!

61. Silver or gold? Silver jewelry, gold bars!!

62 Croutons or bacon bits?: Croutons (little squares of toasted bread), and bacon bits (imitation though, not real).

******FIRST THINGS THAT COME TO MIND******

64. Retards: WHAT?? Anyone who would call a mentally challenged person that, is definitely what I'd call ignorant.

65. School: Prison sentence.

66. Grass: Kona Gold.

67. Cow: Yuck, milk.

68. Canada: Aay.

69. Mouse: Mickey.

70. Hands: Diamonds and pearls.

******THE PAST 48 HOURS, HAVE YOU******

71. Watched a movie?: Yes, "Thursday". (with Mickey Rourke and Thomas Janes).

72. Talked on the phone?: Yes, to my son, Gil.

73. Cried?: No.

74. Threw up?: No.

75. Drank a glass of water?: Yes, several of them.

76. Talked to the opposite sex: Yes, Russell (he was with Kiara).

77. Read a book or magazine?: Yes, "Obsidian Butterfly" (Anita Blake, Vampire Executioner, by Laurell K. Hamilton).

78. Watched TV?: Yes, with my grandkids, the four younger ones.

80. Taken a shower?: Yes, two.

81. Taken a picture?: No, I didn't.

82. Listened to music?: A bit.

83. Kissed someone?: Yep, my grandkids and daughter, at least three or four times each in that time span.

84. ??<: ...., Yes, I think, therefore I am.

85. Wondered what the hell happened to..., 84?: Not really, I'm completely self motivated by any vacuum.

*****BELIEVE IN...,******

86. Heaven?: Yes, my future home, thank you very much!! Hope to see you there.

88. Aliens?: Yes, this earth is not my home, so I have to believe.

89. Fun for the entire family?: Whoever is in a "fun having" sort of mood, it's fine with me.

90. Freedom of speech?: Yes, unless it's yelling "fire" in a crowded place to cause a panic.

91. Love?: Yes, and I'll have some more, please.

92. magic?: Yes, human's are magical creatures, made by GOD.

*******SOME RANDOM STUFF******

93. Last movie you saw in theaters?: Harry Potter's latest.

94. Are you listening to music right now?: No, Cherokee's watching "Poirot".

95. What clothes are you wearing right now?: Black clam diggers, and a red and black I D W E E B t-shirt. (Individuals Deemed Worthy of Elevated Existence and Beyond) Our own brand.

96. Do u like your middle name?: It's Grant, and yes I do. Many in our family have this name, starting with our father, Gilbert Grant Goodwin.

97. What is the best thing since sliced bread?: Spray Whipped Cream, and Chunky Peanut Butter.

98. What color is your backpack?: I don't use no stinking backpack. I carry a purse, and it's black.

WHERES 99?: Why, it's right here, silly goose.

100. what time is it?: 6:31 p.m.


*SINCE NO MENTION WAS MADE OF ANY OF THE OTHER MISSING NUMBERS, I DIDN'T MENTION THEM EITHER*.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. P.G.D.
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 6:34 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Tuesday, January 10, 2006

NEW WORD USAGES..,

The Washington Post's Style Invitational once again asked readers to take any word from the dictionary, alter it by adding, subtracting, or changing one letter, and supply a new definition.

Here are this year's winners:

1. Bozone (n.): The substance surrounding stupid people that stops bright ideas from penetrating. The bozone layer, unfortunately, shows little sign of breaking down in the near future.

2. Foreploy (v): Any misrepresentation about yourself for the purpose of getting laid.

3. Cashtration (n.): The act of buying a house, which renders the subject financially impotent for an indefinite period.

4. Giraffiti (n): Vandalism spray-painted very, very high up.

5. Sarchasm (n): The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.

6. Inoculatte (v): To take coffee intravenously when you are running late.

7. Hipatitis (n): Terminal coolness.

8. Osteopornosis (n): A degenerate disease. (This one got extra credit).

9. Karmageddon (n): It's like, when everybody is sending off all these really bad vibes, right? And then, like, the Earth explodes and it's like, a serious bummer.

10. Decafalon (n.): The grueling event of getting through the day consuming only things that are good for you.

11. Glibido (v): All talk and no action.

12. Dopeler effect (n): The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.

13. Arachnoleptic fit (n.): The frantic dance performed just after you've accidentally walked through a spider web.

14. Beelzebug (n.): Satan in the form of a mosquito that gets into your bedroom at three in the morning and cannot be cast out.

15. Caterpallor (n.): The colour you turn after finding half a grub in the fruit you're eating.

****************************************************
And the pick of the literature:
****************************************************

16. Ignoranus (n): A person who's both stupid and an a - hole.

Once again, The Washington Post has published the winning submissions to its yearly contest, in which readers are asked to supply alternate meanings for common words. The winners are:

2. Flabbergasted (adj.), appalled over how much weight you have gained.

7. Lymph (v.), to walk with a lisp.

9. Flatulence (n.) emergency vehicle that picks you up after you are run over by a steamroller.

14. Oyster (n.), a person who sprinkles his conversation with Yiddishisms.

15. Frisbeetarianism (n.), (back by popular demand): The belief that, when you die, your soul flies up onto the roof and gets stuck there.

16. Circumvent (n.), an opening in the front of boxer shorts worn by Jewish men.
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 5:33 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Monday, January 09, 2006

Saved And Single.

(Author Unknown)

What makes you think that just because I am An Attractive woman of GOD-ly intelligence,

That I'm incomplete without a mate?

Who told you That, Without a man,

Something's missing From my life?

And if so, What would that be?

Love? I love myself
And more importantly I love the Lord.

He told me that when I delight in Him, He will give me the desires of my heart.

Security? I have everything I need according to His riches in glory.

Intimacy? Now, how's a man going to get to know me. When he doesn't even know who he is in the Lord?

See my Father told me I'm above a ruby's worth. And a gem does not seek. It is sought.

I'm single and that's all right with me.

See, it's not that I oppose relationships.
It's that I detest co-dependency

As a woman I know it is not my role, To chase after any man.
Esther 2:14 Reads:

That I am to wait on my king and when he's delighted in me.

He Will call me by my name.

My Lord does not intend for me to be needy or desperate.

I am to be Cherished, Relished, Valued, and Honored,

It's not my job to convince him

Or Convict him of that,

My mate will already know it And consistently show it

And he will stay on his knees daily. Not just to adore me,

But to praise the Lord for "The virtuous woman" he has found,

So, when you see me by myself
I'm not alone.

I know what I have coming to me.

I'm single and saved, and right now that's all I need to be!



Please forward this to all the women in your contacts list!

**Whether married or single it applies to us all!**
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 2:37 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Friday, January 06, 2006

OUR DAILY BREAD.
Last time I checked, nobody likes having problems—problems with money, problems with cars, problems with computers, problems with people, problems with health. We would all prefer a life with as few difficulties as possible.

So, if you were to offer people the choice between (1) a future totally free of problems, sorrow, tears, and pain, and (2) a future full of pain, suffering, regret, and anguish—they would choose option one, right? Jesus died on the cross to give us opportunity to experience that option. If we repent of our sins and trust Him as our Savior, He has promised us a life of fellowship with God in a place the Bible calls heaven.

A place with no problems. A place where there are no more tears. People living in a problem-filled world ought to be standing in line to grab that offer. Unfortunately, many haven't heard the good news; others have refused to trust Christ.

When people die without Jesus, it's too late to take the offer, and they go to a place of torment the Bible calls hell. Do you hate trouble and pain?

Turn to Jesus and accept His offer of forgiveness. Your problems in this world won't disappear, but you'll reserve a home in heaven—a place of eternal joy and peace with God. —Dave Branon

Jesus is calling, "Today you must choose"!
If you delay, you surely will lose;
Listening now, you can hear the Lord's voice,
Take His salvation—make heaven your choice! —Hess

You must accept God's Son today if you want to live in heaven's sunshine tomorrow.
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 5:02 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Thursday, January 05, 2006

GIRLFRIENDS!!
Girlfriends keep your children, and your secrets. Girlfriends bring casseroles and scrub your bathroom when you are sick. Girlfriends give advice when you ask for it. Sometimes you take it sometimes you don't. Girlfriends still love you, even when they don't agree with our choices. Girlfriends laugh with you and you don't need canned jokes to start the laughter. Girlfriends are there for you, in an instant and truly, when the hard times come.

Girlfriends listen when you lose a job or a husband/man. Girlfriends listen when your children break your heart. Girlfriends listen when your parents' minds and bodies fail. Girlfriends pray with you and for you. My Girlfriends bless my life. As we go into the new year, let us be mindful of all the blessings.

God has bestowed upon each and every one of us. Let us thank him for our joys as well as our sorrows. Let us be reminded none of us are perfect and we all fall short of the goodness of God but, through his Grace and Mercy, we are saved. That is definitely something to shout about.

Let's take with us into the new year joy and happiness, any unnecessary baggage can stay in 2005, claim 2006 to be victorious.

AMEN AMEN!!
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 7:58 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke

Ten Things I've learned over my Lifetime.

Number 10 - Life is sexually transmitted.

Number 9 - Good health is merely the slowest possible rateat which one can die.

Number 8 - Men have two emotions: Hungry and Horny. If yousee him without an erection, make him a sandwich.

Number 7 - Give a person a fish and you feed them for aday; teach a person to use the Internet and they won't bother you forweeks.

Number 6 - Some people are like a Slinky...not really goodfor anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see onetumble down the stairs.

Number 5 - Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday,lying in hospitals dying of nothing.

Number 4 - All of us could take a lesson from the weather.It pays no attention to criticism.

Number 3 - Why does a slight tax increase cost you twohundred dollars and a substantial tax cut saves you thirty cents?

Number 2 - In the 60's, people took acid to make the worldweird. Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.

AND THE NUMBER 1 THOUGHT FOR 2006 - We know exactly whereone cow with mad-cow-disease is located among the millions andmillions of cows in America but we haven't got a clue as to wherethousands of illegal immigrants and terrorists are located.

Maybe we should put the Department of Agriculture in charge of immigration.
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 7:53 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Wednesday, January 04, 2006

This is great, take a moment to read it, it will make your day! The ending will surprise you.

A wealthy man and his son loved to collect rare works of art. Theyhad everything in their collection, from Picasso to Raphael.
They would often sit together and admire the great works of art.When the Vietnam conflict broke out, the son went to war.

He was very courageous and died in battle while rescuing another soldier. The father was gratified and yet, grieved deeply for his only son. About a month later, just before Christmas, there was a knock at the door.

A young man stood at the door with a large package in his hands.He said, "Sir, you don't know me, but I am the soldier for whom your son gave his life.He saved many lives that day, and he was carrying me to safety when a bullet struck him in the heart and he died instantly.

He often talked about you, and your love for art."The young man held out this package. "I know this isn't much. I'm not really a great artist, but I think your son would have wanted you to have this"

The father opened the package. It was a portrait of his son, painted by the young man. He stared in awe at the way the soldier had captured the personality of his son in the painting.

The father was so drawn to the eyes that his own eyes swelled up with tears He thanked the young man and offeredto pay him for the picture. "Oh, no sir, I could never repay what your son did for me. It's a gift.

"The father hung the portrait over his mantle. Every time visitorscame to his home he took them to see the portrait of his son before he showed them any of the other great works he had collected. The man died a few months later.

There was to be a great auction of his paintings. Many influential people gathered, excited over seeing the great paintings and having an opportunity to purchase one for their collection.

On the platform sat the painting of the son. The auctioneer pounded his gavel. "We will start the bidding with this picture of the son. Who will bid for this picture?"

There was silence.Then a voice in the back of the room shouted, "We want to see the famous paintings.
"Skip this one".
But the auctioneer persisted. "Will somebody bid for this painting. Who will start the bidding? $100, $200?"
Another voice angrily. "We didn't come to see this painting. We came to see the Van Goghs, the Rembrandts. Get on with the real bids!"

But still the auctioneer continued. "The son! The son! Who'll take the son?" Finally, a voice came from the very back of the room. It was the long time gardener of the man and his son.

"I'll give $10 for the painting." Being a poor man, it was all he could afford. "We have $10, who will bid $20?"

"Give it to him for $10. Let's see the masters." "$10 is the bid, won't someone bid $20?" The crowd was becoming angry.

They didn't want the picture of the son.They wanted the more worthy investments for their collections.The auctioneer pounded the gavel. "Going once, twice, SOLD for $10!"

A man sitting on the second row shouted, "Now let's get on with the collection!" The auctioneer laid down his gavel.
"I'm sorry, the auction is over."

"What about the other paintings?".

"I am sorry. When I was called to conduct this auction, I was toldof a secret stipulation in the will. I was not allowed to reveal that stipulation until this time. Only the painting of the son would be auctioned.

Whoever bought that painting would inherit the entire estate, including all the other paintings. The man who took the son gets everything"!

"God gave His son 2,000 years ago to die on the cross. Much like the auctioneer,
His message today is: "The son, the son, who'll take the son?"

Because, you see, whoever takes the Son gets everything.

Please send this out to people and back to the one who sent it to you. Do whatever you like, but remember that maybe "one" of the people you might have taken the time to send this to, may be just the person who needs to hear this message.

You have a choice to make.
"God Bless".
Amen.
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 11:11 PM (0) comments

<Globaldust Fan Locations for Mickey Rourke Sunday, January 01, 2006

CONSIDER YOUR BURDENS
A lecturer was giving a lecture to his students on stress management. He raised a glass of water and asked the audience, "How heavy do you think this glass of water is?"

The students' answers ranged from 20g to 500g.

"It does not matter on the absolute weight. It depends on how long you hold it. If I hold it for a minute, it is OK. If I hold it for an hour, I will have an ache in my right arm.

If I hold it for a day, you will have to call an ambulance. It is the exact same weight, but the longer I hold it, the heavier it becomes. If we carry our burdens all the time, sooner or later, we will not be able to carry on, the burden becoming increasingly heavier.

"What you have to do is to put the glass down, rest for a while before holding it up again. We have to put down the burden periodically, so that we can be refreshed and are able to carry on.

"So, before you return home from work tonight, put the burden of work down. Don't carry it back home. You can pick it up tomorrow.Whatever burdens you are having now on your shoulders, let it down for a moment if you can.

Pick it up again later when you have rested. Rest and relax. Life is short, enjoy it!
~~~~~~~~~~Pamela~~~~~~~~~~~
sat down to play at 7:39 PM (0) comments








ABOUT ME



name: Pamela

age: 57

profile: 6071684

comments: SPEAK TO ME

Video code provided by MusicVideoCodes.com




MY Children's SITES

Gil's Design
LaShane's Creations
Cherokee's Book Group

Plush Cafe

COOL BLOGS

Cherokee's Blog
LaShane's Blog


ARCHIVES

~~~SCRIPTURES~~~

ISAIAH 55:6

JOHN 3:16

MATTHEW 22:14

Get awesome blog templates like this one from BlogSkins.com